> A quote in the article describes her as being 'still awake', but I wonder what that means. I suppose both physical and neurological observable processes that

> A quote in the article describes her as being 'still awake', but I wonder what that means. I suppose both physical and neurological observable processes that as we know define 'sleep' and 'awake': her eyes were open but with a blank stare and so on, and since they said she did not exhibit neural signs of epilepsy, she was wired to an EEG, so brain patterns would possibly not be matching any phase of sleep but wakefulness. That's all that could be inferred from the article, which is honestly quite thin and sensationalist.