4 ms·
I think the article was OCR'd. There were a few other mistakes that were clearly misinterpreted characters. I think the 1 in the thousands place is actually a c
by pathdependent 12y ago
I think the article was OCR'd. There were a few other mistakes that were clearly misinterpreted characters. I think the 1 in the thousands place is actually a comma on the source.
- merraksh 12y agoGood point. There are many hints that article was OCR'd, for instance an ".4ECL" instead of "AECL".