3 ms·
I really like the Qt syntax. It's well though out, readable, I can overlook it without years of study and it has a good documentation. I think it helps to not t
by skriticos2 12y ago
I really like the Qt syntax. It's well though out, readable, I can overlook it without years of study and it has a good documentation. I think it helps to not think about it as C++ at all, because it isn't really. It's a syntax subset of C++ with a few extensions and it's own standard library that happens to use a C++ compiler somewhere down the toolchain.
I don't see the issue with the object hierarchies either. You have your QObject and QWidget classes that are important and then all the stuff that builds on that. Not that complicated really once you get into it.
The UTF-16 thing is ugly, yea, but I did never see a practical issue with it.
- aceperry 12y agoTotally agree. After studying C++, I was wary of trying to use the language. It seemed to me that you'll get into trouble quickly and it requires years of experience to become an expert. I would rather use Qt because it insulates you from many of the pitfalls of C++. I especially like the slots and signals paradigm. I know there are libraries that do the same thing, but if you stay within the Qt framework, you'll be a lot more productive.