But there's an extradition treaty with the UK which has a worrying low threshold of proof (that of "reasonable suspicion") which they'd easily clear. We've sen

But there's an extradition treaty with the UK which has a worrying low threshold of proof (that of "reasonable suspicion") which they'd easily clear. We've sent 77 people to the US in the last 10 years - it's used all the time. If the UK sent him to Sweden both countries (the UK and Sweden) have to agree to the extradition as the law is set up to prevent exactly this sort of thing happening. The claim you outline doesn't really make sense if you look at what's really involved.