we have no good statistics due to issues with self reporting, non-reporting, etc. It isn't good to state things with authority that cannot actually be known.

we have no good statistics due to issues with self reporting, non-reporting, etc. It isn't good to state things with authority that cannot actually be known. It's very possible, for example, that the reason the 'vast majority of sexual assault and rape prosecutions and charges do not end in any conviction' is because they were either false accusations, or not clearly rape of the sort where the woman was forced into the act. It's a amusing to watch someone both say that the majority of cases don't end in a conviction, but also that the rate of false accusations are tiny. How does one make that conclusion based upon the evidence as presented? The answer is simple: One simply has that opinion, and the facts are irrelevant.