4 ms·
.NET isn't a language. The languages you list really suck compared to Go. They are ridiculously verbose. Goroutines in particular are really quite nice.
by anko 12y ago
.NET isn't a language.
The languages you list really suck compared to Go. They are ridiculously verbose. Goroutines in particular are really quite nice.
- pjmlp 12y ago> .NET isn't a language. It is easier to name the eco-system than all the languages with available compilers targeting .NET. > The languages you list really suck compared to Go. They are ridiculously verbose. Except they embrace the last 30 years of language research. > Goroutines in particular are really quite nice. Goroutines are nothing new. Modula-2 already had them.
- anko 12y agoGosh this reply is ridiculous. We're talking about languages and .net isn't a language. The differences between visual basic and f# are vast. Are you saying the last 30 years of language research dictate that languages should be more verbose? Comparing go-routines to modula-2 is disingenuous at best. Multiprogramming is nothing like multithreading.