3 ms·
I wonder how much more expensive Herschel would have been, if ESA had gone with an closed-cycle cooler instead of using a limited liquid Helium supply directly.
by welterde 12y ago
I wonder how much more expensive Herschel would have been, if ESA had gone with an closed-cycle cooler instead of using a limited liquid Helium supply directly.
- privong 12y agoI'm not sure closed-cycle coolers can get as cold as evaporation of liquid helium? Herschel was cooled to ~1.7 K [0] while MIRI will only be cooled to 7K [1]. Also, with regard to reliability, evaporation of liquid helium is a pretty foolproof design, while closed-cycle systems can potentially break and end a mission early. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herschel_Space_Observatory#Instrumentation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herschel_Space_Observatory#Ins... [1] http://jwst.nasa.gov/miri.html http://jwst.nasa.gov/miri.html
- welterde 12y agoAre the individual instruments cooled to that temperature though? Because if they are not, then the difference doesn't matter. Had a look at the SPIRE manual [0][1] and it seems that Herschel does include an Helium cooler to cool SPIRE and PACS to 300mK. On the other hand a closed-cycle system can also extend the mission, since you won't run out of cooling at a fixed point in time. [0] http://herschel.esac.esa.int/Docs/SPIRE/html/spire_handbook.html http://herschel.esac.esa.int/Docs/SPIRE/html/spire_handbook.... [1] http://herschel.esac.esa.int/Docs/Herschel/html/ch02.html http://herschel.esac.esa.int/Docs/Herschel/html/ch02.html