The most worrying part is the flip side, which is the takedown notice must state that “under penalty of perjury, that the information contained in the notificat

The most worrying part is the flip side, which is the takedown notice must state that “under penalty of perjury, that the information contained in the notification is accurate.” [512(c)(3)(A)(vi)]. In fact, here it is[1]: > Qualcomm is the owner of an exclusive copyright for each of these documents. Cyveillance is authorized to act on behalf of Qualcomm, and has a good faith belief that the publication and/or disclosure by your web site is not authorized by Qualcomm, any of Qualcomm’s agents, or the law. I certify, under penalty of perjury, that the information in this notice is accurate. The pertinent document: https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_sony_huashan/blob/cm-11.0/rootdir/system/etc/xtwifi.conf https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_sony_huashan/b... [1]: https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2014-07-02-Qualcomm.md https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2014-07-02-Qualco...