5 ms·

Does anyone have any context or information as to what this is?

• deleted 12y ago
  [deleted]
• anateus 12y ago
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XKeyscore http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XKeyscore
• acqq 12y ago
  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7983124 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7983124 The article commented has the whole context. For us programmers it's interesting, among other bigger issues, to see that the rules contain the pieces of code in C++.
  • GHFigs 12y ago
    The article commented has the whole context. It really doesn't. In spite of repeatedly claiming things like that people searching for Tor are "monitored" or users are "tracked", it's completely vague about what that those terms actually mean and provides zero examples.
    • acqq 12y ago
      Do we read the same article? It actually has 5 pages and it attempts to explain the different sections of the file. http://daserste.ndr.de/panorama/aktuell/NSA-targets-the-privacy-conscious,nsa230.html http://daserste.ndr.de/panorama/aktuell/NSA-targets-the-priv... http://daserste.ndr.de/panorama/aktuell/nsa230_page-2.html http://daserste.ndr.de/panorama/aktuell/nsa230_page-2.html http://daserste.ndr.de/panorama/aktuell/nsa230_page-3.html http://daserste.ndr.de/panorama/aktuell/nsa230_page-3.html ... Maybe you've read only the first page and missed the remaining four?
      • GHFigs 12y ago
        Yes, I read it, and I stand by what I said. The article explains a set of rules used to filter a set of information out of another set, but it does not support claims about what is done with that set of information. There is a lot of insinuation, but no example of any individual user of Tor or reader of Linux Journal, etc. being monitored or tracked simply for doing so.
        • acqq 12y ago
          You can always demand even more proofs, but it's not probable that they'll come easily -- it's obvious that such leaking is extremely dangerous. This is still significantly more that public knows now than it knew before the article.
        • influx 12y ago
          It makes more sense to me that they actually use these in AND statements. For example, uses TOR and searches for JIHAD could be traffic that would be interesting. If I had to guess, the Linux Journal stuff was just something a geek put in there during testing.
          • runiq 12y ago
            That's what I thought—these rules obviously aren't the entire pipeline, and the results obtained from them may or may not be interesting in and of themselves. That said, using Tails probably does increase my XKeyScore rating. Is there anything published as to the scale of the rating? Something along the lines of "Once you get a rating of (say) 500, we're gonna come and beat down your door, wife and dog, and not necessarily in that order".
            • GHFigs 12y ago
              There's no indication that there is such a rating exists, or that any such decisions are made based on automated rules. It's a tool for selecting some traffic out of all traffic, not for replacing human analysis or decision-making. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XKEYSCORE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XKEYSCORE