3 ms·
I think he's talking about the labor market here. Conventional microeconomics would suggest that increasing the price of labor by setting or increasing a minimu
by ufmace 12y ago
I think he's talking about the labor market here. Conventional microeconomics would suggest that increasing the price of labor by setting or increasing a minimum wage would reduce the demand by employers for the product, human labor.
That may be true in the limited case, but the argument is clouded by questions like whether increasing income of all of the employers' customers would allow the employer to do more business or raise prices, thus potentially increasing their demand for labor to compensate.
I can't see any doubt that this would happen, but the extent is hard to determine. How much will the average consumer's wages actually increase, and how much of that will be taken up by increased prices in other goods they buy? If they end up with more money, what will they do with it - save more, buy higher-quality goods, buy luxuries? So the overall effect on any particular business is unknown.
- ssmoot 12y agoWhen we're talking about minimum wage however (other comments he made), that's just patently untrue though. Even if a service job could get by with fewer labor hours without impacting their sales negatively, there are always plenty of other businesses who couldn't. I mean, I worked those jobs when minimum wage was like $4.25. I haven't noticed a drop in employment at the franchise or small business level. Have you? From a practical standpoint, these places aren't just spreading around labor hours willy-nilly today. If they find some "fat" to trim, they do so, so the management can take home a larger slice of the pie.