2 ms·
> to avoid the risk of unnecessary reputational damage to Goldman Sachs What horrible injustice, being known as failure in security for being failure in securi
by jarman 12y ago
> to avoid the risk of unnecessary reputational damage to Goldman Sachs
What horrible injustice, being known as failure in security for being failure in security. Poor Goldman Sachs.
- vehementi 12y agoIsn't the reputational damage already done? The leak happened.