I think I saw some proposal to replace the function composition from prelude (.) with some other symbol, and presumably making it illegal to define operators na

I think I saw some proposal to replace the function composition from prelude (.) with some other symbol, and presumably making it illegal to define operators named (.). This would of course break a lot of code, but it seems simple enough to make a largely automated transition. The reason for the proposal was that (.) for function composition made the grammar more complex or problematic because of the accessing 'operator' (.), and/or something that had to do with more fancy accessing and such (lenses?).