4 ms·
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(67+TB)+%2F+(2*(1+Gb%2Fs)+ http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(67+TB)+%2F+(2*(1+Gb%2F...) It'll take 3 days at the theor
by notaddicted 17y ago
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(67+TB)+%2F+(2*(1+Gb%2Fs)+ http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(67+TB)+%2F+(2*(1+Gb%2F...)
It'll take 3 days at the theoretical max of the networking equipment to read/write the 67TB. The overhead of HTTPS constrains the networking so this is too low.
I'd expect that their internet connection (i.e. in/out of the data center) is the real bottleneck.
I believe that the system is being used as a tape drive replacement.
- lsc 17y agoIf the load is relatively sequential, then yeah. But if the load is mostly random, then there is an argument for having more cache.