3 ms·
1) That is where a significant portion of their revenue comes from. 2) News feed has been around for a long time in a form beyond what's newest. This has been
by voronoff 12y ago
1) That is where a significant portion of their revenue comes from.
2) News feed has been around for a long time in a form beyond what's newest. This has been well publicized.
3) Every company with durative engagement tests on users. If they don't, they don't have the interaction with users they desire.
4) Much like how the music in stores example is reminiscent of the CIA used music torture in Guantanamo. Or maybe, just maybe, there is some nuance to discuss?
5) This is the most valid of your points, but it's not uncommon for legal documents to be updated for more general coverage and doesn't necessarily imply the activity is unethical.
6) Gmail does. It's called spam filtering.
- anigbrowl 12y agoGmail's spam filtering is certainly not run without consent or knowledge, unless you think I should be reviewing each piece of spam individually. It operates with the consent of spammers, but that hardly matters.
- voronoff 12y agoChanges to Gmail's spam filtering algorithms, however, do happen without your consent or knowledge. Similar to how changes to the algorithm governing FB's News Feed happen without your consent or knowledge, but you know that it exists. Like your spam folder, you can tab to "Most Recent" to see what you are missing.