I agree. If said person does disseminate private information, and it's illegal, that's on the receiver. In any case, I don't trust Goldman Sachs. They lie [1]

I agree. If said person does disseminate private information, and it's illegal, that's on the receiver. In any case, I don't trust Goldman Sachs. They lie [1] with no hint of limit or shame. Did they leak client information, or incriminating evidence? Sure, it's conjecture, but the last thing I'd do is violate someone's privacy or hand over personal information on Goldman's word. [1] http://m.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-people-vs-goldman-sachs-20110511?page=1 http://m.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-people-vs-goldma...