3 ms·
It looks like the URL of the article has an alternative (older?) headline in it: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-07-02/tinders-forgotten-woman-whitne
by dbloom 12y ago
It looks like the URL of the article has an alternative (older?) headline in it:
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-07-02/tinders-forgotten-woman-whitney-wolfe-sexism-and-startup-creation-myths http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-07-02/tinders-forg...
"Tinder's Forgotten Woman: Whitney Wolfe, Sexism, and Startup Creation Myths"
- dang 12y agoAh yes, the "extract alternative title from URL" trick. My title fu is failing me, though. Is this one really better?
- robg 12y agoI think so, it's certainly more descriptive of what's contained therein. EDIT: The generic "women" in the current title is certainly more misleading and may be contributing to the penalty being assessed by those who haven't read the piece. The article only discusses one woman.
- dang 12y agoOk, we changed it (from "The Truth About Tinder and Women").