4 ms·
I'd have preferred support for Common JS (or closer to it), which doesn't seem to suffer from the namespacing and syntax issues raised by this new spec. Importi
by drderidder 12y ago
I'd have preferred support for Common JS (or closer to it), which doesn't seem to suffer from the namespacing and syntax issues raised by this new spec. Importing to the global namespace by default seems kinda dodgy, and the mechanisms to avoid name collisions are syntactically awkward, imho. I think this proposal might actually have cemented the long-term popularity of browserify for years to come.