Oh. My. I have to read this. And those 40 pages too: https://doc-0s-0c-apps-viewer.googleusercontent.com/viewer/secure/pdf/3nb9bdfcv3e2h2k1cmql0ee9cvc5lole/v62

Oh. My. I have to read this. And those 40 pages too: https://doc-0s-0c-apps-viewer.googleusercontent.com/viewer/secure/pdf/3nb9bdfcv3e2h2k1cmql0ee9cvc5lole/v622t878p4t7acgulppmol4917jj6r37/1404300675000/gview/*/ACFrOgAjc6PBGwWglGwPOHJ07cVr3vPLd6ejofv4DO80ORi2yI8C0SAK3jqDm9ZULzTz4wOHE22oiM6_U-KY7T8d4ZqctSzTvhLjcQRnecP8Sf0Xf02O8AoSMbIDuq0= https://doc-0s-0c-apps-viewer.googleusercontent.com/viewer/s... Okay, a cursory look shows this will only work on context-free grammar. I have read another paper showing that you can add some context sensitivity to Earley parsers, I hope you can do that with Marpa parsers as well: ultimately, I want to combine the generality of Earley parsing with the expressive power of Parsing Expression Grammars. Damn, though. If Marpa parsing is a good as its promises, I may have to jump ship again. (The first time I did was when going from PEGs to Earley.)