3 ms·

That was one of the best technical reviews I've ever read. His composition style flowed incredibly well.

• masklinn 17y ago
  Check out his previous OSX reviews as well, they're glorious: http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2000/10/macos-x-beta.ars http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2000/10/macos-x-beta.ar... http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2001/04/macos-x.ars http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2001/04/macos-x.ars http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2001/10/macosx-10-1.ars http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2001/10/macosx-10-1.ars http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2002/09/macosx-10-2.ars http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2002/09/macosx-10-2.ars http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2003/11/macosx-10-3.ars http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2003/11/macosx-10-3.ars http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2005/04/macosx-10-4.ars http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2005/04/macosx-10-4.ars http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2007/10/mac-os-x-10-5.ars http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2007/10/mac-os-x-10-5.a...
  • cubicle67 17y ago
    This is interesting; you've posted the exact same set of links as mikedouglas below, but 4 hours later, and yet (at the time of writing) your comment's got 3 points, and his is on -1 Is it because he used bit.ly? (I'm not being snarky, just curious)
    • tvon 17y ago
      No clue, I voted him up and was tempted to vote masklinn down for being redundant (but didn't).
    • masklinn 17y ago
      > Is it because he used bit.ly? (I'm not being snarky, just curious) Might be. I hadn't seen his comment yet when I posted mine (was just scrolling down) and just wanted to point the previous reviews to huygen (I'd kinda missed they were on the last page and he'd already got the links through the article itself).