3 ms·
I agree. I don't see where this is significantly better. You can add data to signed certs as well, so you can get the SIN functionality that way if I'm not mist
by doragcoder 12y ago
I agree. I don't see where this is significantly better. You can add data to signed certs as well, so you can get the SIN functionality that way if I'm not mistaken.
I also didn't see if this touched the blockchain at all. They made note about the SIN being public (then again, so is a Public Key), so I'm looking for the SIN to be in a blockchain somewhere.
- lifeisstillgood 12y agoI do need to dig into SIN for that same reason - it makes sense - I think a lot of government identity and records schemes would get vastly simpler if I put my public key online and encrypted my own records I discussed it with a govt architect who wanted to get rid of the "bloody database at centre of every application that thinks it needs to store citizens data" It's a powerful idea