4 ms·
Previous reviews: http://bit.ly/osx10-5 http://bit.ly/osx10-5 http://bit.ly/osx10-4 http://bit.ly/osx10-4 http://bit.ly/osx10-3 http://bit.ly/osx10-3 http:/
by mikedouglas 17y ago
Previous reviews:
http://bit.ly/osx10-5 http://bit.ly/osx10-5
http://bit.ly/osx10-4 http://bit.ly/osx10-4
http://bit.ly/osx10-3 http://bit.ly/osx10-3
http://bit.ly/osx10-2 http://bit.ly/osx10-2
http://bit.ly/osx10-1 http://bit.ly/osx10-1
http://bit.ly/osx10-0 http://bit.ly/osx10-0
- Derrek 17y agoI'm curious, why use URL shortners on HN? It's not like you're constrained to 140 characters. (I'm not trying to be a jerk, just trying to understand your reasoning.)
- ZeroGravitas 17y agoAlso, did you just take those URLs from the last page of the article, and if so why not just link there: http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2009/08/mac-os-x-10-6.ars/23 http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2009/08/mac-os-x-10-6.a...
- mikedouglas 17y agoSiracusa tweeted the links the day before, so I had them in a textfile on the desktop. Because the URLs were easier to read than the originals, I didn't think it would be an issue.