3 ms·
Well, I assumed you held the normal interpretation. I'm OK with being wrong occasionally. If who you are and what you want is socially inappropriate to your fr
by tormeh 12y ago
Well, I assumed you held the normal interpretation. I'm OK with being wrong occasionally.
If who you are and what you want is socially inappropriate to your friends or romantic interests then I suggest finding new ones. Seriously. Similarly with everyone you can choose. Of course, with colleagues and family, certain masks have to be worn... But minimize mask-wearing!
Someone once told me that "If my friends didn't know me, they wouldn't be my friends". Best thing I ever heard. After I became more honest with my friends I feel a lot less lonely and it turned out they were very accepting.
- SilasX 12y agoSo you advise, in at least some cases, people go to those whom they haven't met, and express an explicit desire for sex, exactly as it comes to them in their mind? No? Then this is exactly what I'm criticizing: you have some classifier that you have black-box access to, with boundaries you can't really specify when prompted. And I would not have the confidence to convey something as advice unless my understanding yielded an intuition for these boundaries, which yours does not. Hence: "If I actually understood this topic as well as you claim to, I would reveal that understanding much better than you currently are." Now, the black box, for you, may certainly emit the correct answers, but not in what that allows you to convey it as meaningful advice.