4 ms·
So you're saying that Ms. Wolfe can accuse him of sending harassing messages, but IAC can't? Even if IAC has irrefutable evidence that it happened?
by dbloom 12y ago
So you're saying that Ms. Wolfe can accuse him of sending harassing messages, but IAC can't?
Even if IAC has irrefutable evidence that it happened?
- discardorama 12y agoDoes the "it became clear" in IAC's statement mean nothing to you?
- dbloom 12y agoIt means that they have irrefutable evidence, as I said before. What does it mean to you?
- walshemj 12y agoIAC can what it likes but disclosing this while its own investigation is still in progress could lead to him getting a better result than he deserves ie he might say my employer did not follow the rules so I am claiming unfair dismissal and win compensation. Incompetence or deliberate mistake?
- mankmandrickson 12y agoSee, the problem is the word "harassing". He sent her emails? Fact. The nature was sexual? Fact. They were "harassing"? The very conjecture that is to be investigated. As an example, if I send a text to my girlfriend and co-worker that says "I'm gonna plow your fields tonight", it is a fact it was sent, was sexual but harassing? That is contextual.