6 ms·
I'm the ED of a 501(c)3 non-profit (http://localwiki.org http://localwiki.org), and when we applied for our (c)3 status we got some flack along these lines, as
by philipn 12y ago
I'm the ED of a 501(c)3 non-profit (http://localwiki.org http://localwiki.org), and when we applied for our (c)3 status we got some flack along these lines, as well. Here's my advice to the Yorba Foundation folks:
If you haven't received your final rejection, you can appeal.
Don't try and do this yourself. The post says they spoke with folks at the Software Freedom Center, which is great, but I highly recommend finding a specialized attorney who's seen lots of applications and knows the right angle. Hire an attorney who specializes in obtaining 501(c)3 status. We made this mistake early on, thinking we could work through the NOLO book and apply ourselves. It cost us. For around $1k you can find a good non-profit attorney to help.
We got flack for the open-source thing, too. Our original exemption application was basically "Hey, we're a charity! We give things away for free and release open source code, which can be used by everyone!" Depending on the IRS agent assigned to you, you might get flack for this as well. Generally speaking, they may not like that a for-profit business can use your organization's by-product to make lots of money for themselves. We spent some time explaining how OSS worked to the agent, and was able to convince him that because (most) of our OSS is copyleft, that it would be a continually-free-and-open good, not a private benefit.
Nevertheless, just releasing OSS is NOT an exempt purpose. If you read the IRS regulations, they are very specific as to what a core exempt purpose is. You'll need to pick one that fits best. Generally speaking, it's 1) Church stuff 2) Scientific advancement and research 3) Furthering of the arts 4) Education 5) "Charity," meaning helping people who are disadvantaged in some way 6) Some others that I'm not remembering.
Most OSS 501(c)3 don't get exemption by just releasing open source software-- they get exemption by being an educational institution. So you may want to go that route -- the organization's core exemption is the creation of educational materials that help education members of a particular community in XYZ ways. This is what we ended up doing -- we're classified as an educationally-exempt organization. If you look up the 501(c)3 apps of some other OSS non-profits you'll see similarly -- e.g. Plone Foundation is set up as an educational organization.
Edit: If you'd like to take a look at some of our back-and-forth with the IRS agent at the time, check out the page here: http://localwiki.net/org/Historic_501%28c%293_application_process http://localwiki.net/org/Historic_501%28c%293_application_pr... You'll see his response was similar to yours, but we decided to pursue educational exemption and were granted on that basis in the end.
Also, you can call up the IRS Agent assigned to you and talk to them about the application, which can be extremely helpful.
- novaleaf 12y agoI think a key point you make is regarding a for-profit company turning around and utilizing the non-profit assets. If all OSS was 501c3 material, it would be easy to abuse for private R&D purposes.
- reitzensteinm 12y agoCould you describe how this abuse would take place, exactly? R&D is already tax deductible. I could see that if you funded a non profit via income like Kickstarter, that would allow you to use that money over multiple financial years without paying taxes on it in the mean time. But that doesn't really seem egregious if the technology is to be open sourced.
- danielweber 12y agoIf you and I both start a business, but you set yours up so all the producer surplus goes to yourself as the sole shareholder, and I set mine up so all the producer surplus goes to myself as the main employee, why should I be able to claim non-profit status?
- reitzensteinm 12y agoAre there not other protections against that? If your non profit suddenly makes $10 million, you couldn't just pay yourself that money, could you? Surely you have to be able to justify that your spending was aligned with the stated goals of the non profit, if and when audited? Forgive my ignorance, I'm from New Zealand, and the laws are quite different over here. For instance, corporate income tax is franked, so you aren't double taxed on profits. That alone removes a lot of incentive to eliminate the tax a company pays.
- dragonwriter 12y ago> Are there not other protections against that? Sure, there's protections that apply after the fact of abuse, but the whole purpose of having a 501(c)(3) application and review is to try to filter inappropriate entities out before the fact.