7 ms·

Android Market Sales data: pitiful $64/day for a Top 5 app

70 points by adamhowell 17y ago

colinplamondon 17y ago
Holy crap- so much for porting to Android, that's absolutely abysmal.
- jamesk2 17y ago
  It is abysmal but isn't it a bit early in the game to call Android out? Multiple companies are involved in getting these things out and it takes longer to set up than having one company control everything. There's a lot of marketing dollars at work with android and the network effects of the users will ramp up. The first generation of androids were ugly and inelegant compared to the iphone but the next gen looks better thought out and prettier inside and out. Like Wayne Gretsky said, "Skate to where the puck will be"
  - colinplamondon 17y ago
    It's a matter of prioritization- with numbers like that, we'll prioritize to being on every other platform before we go to Android.
    - jamesk2 17y ago
      With 65k apps in the apple app store, it's going to be pretty hard to get any attention for your iphone app. Launching a cool app on Android first will get you a lot of press. There's just less competition there. There are tons of well read bloggers and journalists who would be very interested in your Android App and the people marketing the phones would probably feature it in their ads like apple did with the "There's an app for that" ads. That's how marketers think. "It worked for Apple, so we'll do it too." Going to the iphone first will probably take two weeks to a month to get approved while the Android version can update faster with less hassle. You get to iterate faster and get feedback on the latest results. A faster feedback loop is essential to iteration and improvement. After you get some attention, then you can make an iphone version and if you're a top 5 Android app, that's a good reason for people to take a look. In the history of software, I'd say look at Microsoft Excel. It launched on Mac which had some crazy new features like a GUI. It quickly became the top spreadsheet on the mac (there was little competition). Launched on Windows a couple years later and went on to dominate the category.
  - jacoblyles 17y ago
    Don't forget "a bird in hand is worth two in the bush". At those conversion ratios, it goes without saying that a thousand birds in hand is worth a whole lot more than one in the bush.
  - ubernostrum 17y ago
    Like Wayne Gretsky said, "Skate to where the puck will be" Of course, the flip side (as a lifelong Cubs fan) is that Android developers may be eternally chanting "wait 'til next year". It seems like the big moment for Android is always just around the corner, but never actually arrives.
- caffeine 17y ago
  Haha! The gratuitous graph is hilarious, and you're totally right. Forget about Android.
- Legion 17y ago
  Wait for Android to appear on phones on something besides the US's fourth-place provider. They're coming this fall, and it will likely make a big difference in Android's adoption (and, in turn, its viability as a commercial development platform).
  - dminor 17y ago
    This has me quite excited about Android's future: http://www.cnet.com/8301-19736_1-10307673-251.html?tag=mncol;txt http://www.cnet.com/8301-19736_1-10307673-251.html?tag=mncol... If it had come a month and a half ago Verizon could have saved me a switch to T-Mobile!
- andreyf 17y ago
  It's not quite so black-and-white. I think the main point is here: Hard to find paid apps (We suspect Google would rather just have everything be free since they default most views in the catalog to free apps, or top downloaded apps which means free apps. The option to show paid apps is buried in a submenu.) How many users do you think ever saw that sub-menu, much less clicked on it? Yes, Google would rather have apps be free. So would Apple. Why? Because smart companies try to commoditize their products' complements [1]. This really really sucks for people whose business model is "make money selling an Android app", but personally, I think that's a really crappy model to begin with, be it on Android, on the iPhone, or on desktops. Just make your app free and find another way to make money. 1. http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/StrategyLetterV.html http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/StrategyLetterV.html
jacquesm 17y ago
It's all in the number of devices out there. As the number of devices goes up so should the sales. Using google checkout is just plain silly though, buying an application for a phone for the most part would be 'impulse' buys, in which case you want to remove any possible barrier. That's good business sense anyway but for this kind of product it is an absolute must.
- jrockway 17y ago
  I don't have an Apple account, but I do have a Google Checkout account. That means it's much easier for me to buy an Android app than an iPhone app; and indeed... I have bought a few Android apps. Sales are probably low because only the very very early adopters are using Android right now. When the iPhone was at this level of market penetration, there was no such thing as the App Store. Give it a year or two.
- dejb 17y ago
  > It's all in the number of devices out there. As the number of devices goes up so should the sales. Actually I disagree. The Android marketplace isn't compulsory so many people would be getting their apps from other sources. It's kind of like comparing the the approval rating of the leaders of North Korea with that of the US. Before the iPhone came along nobody would have thought of using a centralised 'app store' as the measure of a platform's strength.
alex_c 17y ago
I got an HTC Magic recently for development, and the first thing I did was check the App Store (sorry, the Market) - I can't find ANY paid apps, even if I mess around with the buried menu setting mentioned by the article. Google checkout only way to buy And that could be why - last I checked, Google checkout wasn't available in Canada.
- scotth 17y ago
  Yes, it is. 20x200.com uses Google Checkout, and I've bought through them a few times.
- wmoxam 17y ago
  Paid apps aren't available in Canada yet. I can see them if I use a T-mobile SIM card.
jonursenbach 17y ago
Their claim about requiring a credit card purchase is bogus because to open up an iTunes account, you need a credit card.
- tptacek 17y ago
  You never need a credit card on you to buy an app.
  - bmelton 17y ago
    Nor do you with Android. It goes entirely through Google Checkout -- Unless you've never set up Checkout (which is admittedly a lot more likely than not having set up Paypal, or a competitor) then you just need your CO credentials.
  - ajross 17y ago
    The Android market uses Google checkout, and all android phones are tied to a Google account. There's certainly no requirement that you physically have a credit card on you, though before you can use the market you do need to set up payments on checkout either via the phone or on your laptop, etc...
- barrkel 17y ago
  That's not true. You can create an iTunes account without any payment information (or with a gift card), and you can also use Paypal, which itself doesn't need a credit card (and of course, they try every trick in the book to avoid using your credit card and use your bank account instead, where you have no recourse).
- joubert 17y ago
  No you don't. You can use an American Express gift card bought at Duane Reed. It is indistinguishable from an Amex credit card.
redorb 17y ago
This actually makes me want to jump in / its a indicator to me that your not that far behind in the game (getting in early, with the android system) - - I really think it 3-5 years android will be what apple is today; I'm not saying to wait around - but perhaps plan for it.
- lurch_mojoff 17y ago
  You, however, do not address either what makes you think that or where would Apple be in you scenario. As thing are today, there is nothing to suggest that Apple are losing steam or that Android is gaining such at a higher rate. It is true in probably every respect of the two platforms, but it is especially true when it comes to the respective app stores. So in that case my prognosmification would be that, even if you're right and Android is where the iPhone is today in a few years, Apple's platform would have grown too by then, maybe even proportionally to Android. Which does not mean one should not develop applications for Android or that they shouldn't "plan for it". But expecting that there is explosive growth just around the corner is absolutely unrealistic.
  - alex_c 17y ago
    There IS explosive growth just around the corner in terms of Android device models. Of course, this doesn't necessarily translate into explosive growth in terms of users.
    - joubert 17y ago
      Good lordy. Well, hopefully it isn't blamed on users' relationship issues.
    - thismat 17y ago
      If they would bring the HTC Hero in to multiple providers they would see a pretty significant jump in users I would imagine. Although, that new Nokia looks pretty great, I might be switching to it if T-Mobile doesn't end up getting the Hero, bad choice ignoring the Hero for the one they used for the mytouch.
- 17y ago
breck 17y ago
It's true if you want to make money, develop for the iPhone and not the Android. But if you want to build neat, useful things I'd say in the long run the Android platform will be better. I think Android versus iPhone is kind of an Apples to Oranges comparison. It's like comparing the PC with the Xbox. Sure, you can make a ton of money developing games for the Xbox, but that also means you have to develop games. From what I've read(with some exceptions), the real money made on the iPhone is in developing games. I wouldn't develop for the Android to make money. I would do it to make cool apps that I would use myself and could distribute myself without going through the App store & review process. I think the Android will be the cooler platform to develop for eventually, unless all you care about is making money. In which case make games.
- potatolicious 17y ago
  "It's true if you want to make money, develop for the iPhone and not the Android." I would argue that if you want to make money, develop for neither.
  - enjo 17y ago
    Yep. The economics on both platforms are really nasty right now.
mis 17y ago
The problem is with the Market application. It's horrible. That being said, I don't have a top 5 app, not even a top 100 app for that matter, but I do make between 50 and 20 dollars a day from it. Better than nothing, and the trend is upward.
- torpor 17y ago
  There are alternatives to the Android Market: http://www.mymarket.cc/ http://www.mymarket.cc/ Try it out, see what you think ..
technomancy 17y ago
As Milton said: "Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven."
- lurch_mojoff 17y ago
  On the other hand, and much more pragmatically, better $3000 a day than $60 a day.
maxklein 17y ago
Android is the linux of the smartphone OSes, and the iPhone OS is the windows.
- dejb 17y ago
  The compulsory centralised app store model of the iPhone makes it an entirely new beast (apart from consoles). The difference is big enough to invalidate the comparison with Windows. Also the fact that their market share is still below below 10% world wide also puts a dint in your metaphor.
- mattparcher 17y ago
  Yes, Android is obscure, but the iPhone almost certainly is not the equivalent of Windows. By most estimates, the iPhone has half of RIM's share in the US, while Apple is a bit closer worldwide (figures vary). According to Information Week, the hardware breaks down as: US: RIM 52%, iPhone 23.3% (up 365% vs 2Q08) HTC 5.6% Global: Nokia 44%, RIM 21%, Apple 13.7% (up 627% vs 2Q08) http://www.informationweek.com/news/personal_tech/smartphones/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=219400707 http://www.informationweek.com/news/personal_tech/smartphone...
jsz0 17y ago
If Google is serious about their App Store, and with Google that's always a concern, they should be promoting the platform. Apple is actively highlighting third party apps as a major selling point of the iPhone platform with constant TV commercials showing off some of the best apps. Google's approach to multiple handset vendors already makes the situation confusing to consumers so it's even more important they advertise. A Google commercial showing off 2 or 3 different Android handsets running some third party apps would be a massive boost for the platform and handset makers. Someone pointed out that the Android platform is really starting to feel like "Linux on the desktop" where it's always the next handset, the next OS revision, etc that's going to change everything. The same basic rule applies: If you fall too far behind commercial alternatives you will lose no matter how good your platform is. Personally I think Google's window of opportunity is very small here. If they can't start making some headway the game is over when the iPhone hits Verizon.
- jrockway 17y ago
  I don't think Google has even tried to market Android yet. Letting the technical users get all the bugs out is a good strategy. Once that is taken care of, Google can open the floodgates. They're an advertising company, remember, so when they want to get the message out, they will do it. But anyway, this is not critically important right now. Andorid and iPhone both satisfy the "I wonder if there's an app for..." for any reasonable value of ... right now. If you have an Android phone, it will do anything you want a phone to do. If you have an iPhone, it will also do anything you want a phone to do (minus being location aware, or having third-party caller ID data loaded when someone calls, or writing your own programs for it, etc.).
dejb 17y ago
I think comparing 'Android Marketplace' with Apple's 'App Store' is somewhat comparing 'apples with oranges'. Android doesn't require all apps to go through their marketplace so you would expect less downloads per user. Android could flourish without any centralised marketplace. Desktop OS's certainly have.
acangiano 17y ago
What prevents a startup from creating an alternative marketplace that accepts all sorts of mainstream payments methods, works within and outside of the US, and doesn't suck? It was my understanding that Android, unlike the iPhone, could install applications from elsewhere.
Andys 17y ago
Here are some reasons why: 1. Poor availability of app store in many countries in the world compared to iPhone 2. Ability to purchase apps outside the appstore - I bought an app from an author's website directly, paying by Paypal. 3. Fewer actual handsets in use worldwide.
spaghetti 17y ago
Give Android Market some time. Recall iTunes was hugely successful before the iPhone came out. Also purchasing music for an iPod is almost identical to purchasing an app for the iPhone (relatively small price for a relatively small item). So App Store just has a huge lead. Doesn't imply Android won't catch up. After all compare Apple vs MS today to Apple vs MS 10-15 years ago.
paulsilver 17y ago
I haven't seen any adverts for Android phones pushing that they have 'Android' as a feature, nor have I seen any adverts for the Android app store. Whereas the iPhone was heavily marketed at normal consumers. It is not surprising that very few people are using the Android store, given that few people know of it's existence. Google and the phone makers are playing the game very differently to Apple. I think it's going to be a long time before I could claim Android is a failure, it's still very early days for the project.
p47 17y ago
I have 2 apps on AMarket right now, making far to less money to live from them. Only solution is to work as a consultant for bigger players. But still the same model is on App Store, my friend who is independent do the same. Nice thing about Android is that casual users won't even know they are using Android, when smartphones will become standard. And slowly they are becoming. From my perspective, AMarket when GOOG will finally make it usable (2.0 in month) may become really profitable. 3 mln users right now. Also new handhelds look really promising, and if Motorola treats Android as their last resort, well I, as a small fish need to follow bigger players behaviour.

70 points by adamhowell 17y ago

colinplamondon 17y ago

Holy crap- so much for porting to Android, that's absolutely abysmal.

jamesk2 17y ago
It is abysmal but isn't it a bit early in the game to call Android out? Multiple companies are involved in getting these things out and it takes longer to set up than having one company control everything. There's a lot of marketing dollars at work with android and the network effects of the users will ramp up. The first generation of androids were ugly and inelegant compared to the iphone but the next gen looks better thought out and prettier inside and out. Like Wayne Gretsky said, "Skate to where the puck will be"
- colinplamondon 17y ago
  It's a matter of prioritization- with numbers like that, we'll prioritize to being on every other platform before we go to Android.
  - jamesk2 17y ago
    With 65k apps in the apple app store, it's going to be pretty hard to get any attention for your iphone app. Launching a cool app on Android first will get you a lot of press. There's just less competition there. There are tons of well read bloggers and journalists who would be very interested in your Android App and the people marketing the phones would probably feature it in their ads like apple did with the "There's an app for that" ads. That's how marketers think. "It worked for Apple, so we'll do it too." Going to the iphone first will probably take two weeks to a month to get approved while the Android version can update faster with less hassle. You get to iterate faster and get feedback on the latest results. A faster feedback loop is essential to iteration and improvement. After you get some attention, then you can make an iphone version and if you're a top 5 Android app, that's a good reason for people to take a look. In the history of software, I'd say look at Microsoft Excel. It launched on Mac which had some crazy new features like a GUI. It quickly became the top spreadsheet on the mac (there was little competition). Launched on Windows a couple years later and went on to dominate the category.
- jacoblyles 17y ago
  Don't forget "a bird in hand is worth two in the bush". At those conversion ratios, it goes without saying that a thousand birds in hand is worth a whole lot more than one in the bush.
- ubernostrum 17y ago
  Like Wayne Gretsky said, "Skate to where the puck will be" Of course, the flip side (as a lifelong Cubs fan) is that Android developers may be eternally chanting "wait 'til next year". It seems like the big moment for Android is always just around the corner, but never actually arrives.
caffeine 17y ago
Haha! The gratuitous graph is hilarious, and you're totally right. Forget about Android.
Legion 17y ago
Wait for Android to appear on phones on something besides the US's fourth-place provider. They're coming this fall, and it will likely make a big difference in Android's adoption (and, in turn, its viability as a commercial development platform).
- dminor 17y ago
  This has me quite excited about Android's future: http://www.cnet.com/8301-19736_1-10307673-251.html?tag=mncol;txt http://www.cnet.com/8301-19736_1-10307673-251.html?tag=mncol... If it had come a month and a half ago Verizon could have saved me a switch to T-Mobile!
andreyf 17y ago
It's not quite so black-and-white. I think the main point is here: Hard to find paid apps (We suspect Google would rather just have everything be free since they default most views in the catalog to free apps, or top downloaded apps which means free apps. The option to show paid apps is buried in a submenu.) How many users do you think ever saw that sub-menu, much less clicked on it? Yes, Google would rather have apps be free. So would Apple. Why? Because smart companies try to commoditize their products' complements [1]. This really really sucks for people whose business model is "make money selling an Android app", but personally, I think that's a really crappy model to begin with, be it on Android, on the iPhone, or on desktops. Just make your app free and find another way to make money. 1. http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/StrategyLetterV.html http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/StrategyLetterV.html

jacquesm 17y ago

It's all in the number of devices out there. As the number of devices goes up so should the sales. Using google checkout is just plain silly though, buying an application for a phone for the most part would be 'impulse' buys, in which case you want to remove any possible barrier. That's good business sense anyway but for this kind of product it is an absolute must.

jrockway 17y ago
I don't have an Apple account, but I do have a Google Checkout account. That means it's much easier for me to buy an Android app than an iPhone app; and indeed... I have bought a few Android apps. Sales are probably low because only the very very early adopters are using Android right now. When the iPhone was at this level of market penetration, there was no such thing as the App Store. Give it a year or two.
dejb 17y ago
> It's all in the number of devices out there. As the number of devices goes up so should the sales. Actually I disagree. The Android marketplace isn't compulsory so many people would be getting their apps from other sources. It's kind of like comparing the the approval rating of the leaders of North Korea with that of the US. Before the iPhone came along nobody would have thought of using a centralised 'app store' as the measure of a platform's strength.

alex_c 17y ago

I got an HTC Magic recently for development, and the first thing I did was check the App Store (sorry, the Market) - I can't find ANY paid apps, even if I mess around with the buried menu setting mentioned by the article. Google checkout only way to buy And that could be why - last I checked, Google checkout wasn't available in Canada.

scotth 17y ago
Yes, it is. 20x200.com uses Google Checkout, and I've bought through them a few times.
wmoxam 17y ago
Paid apps aren't available in Canada yet. I can see them if I use a T-mobile SIM card.

jonursenbach 17y ago

Their claim about requiring a credit card purchase is bogus because to open up an iTunes account, you need a credit card.

tptacek 17y ago
You never need a credit card on you to buy an app.
- bmelton 17y ago
  Nor do you with Android. It goes entirely through Google Checkout -- Unless you've never set up Checkout (which is admittedly a lot more likely than not having set up Paypal, or a competitor) then you just need your CO credentials.
- ajross 17y ago
  The Android market uses Google checkout, and all android phones are tied to a Google account. There's certainly no requirement that you physically have a credit card on you, though before you can use the market you do need to set up payments on checkout either via the phone or on your laptop, etc...
barrkel 17y ago
That's not true. You can create an iTunes account without any payment information (or with a gift card), and you can also use Paypal, which itself doesn't need a credit card (and of course, they try every trick in the book to avoid using your credit card and use your bank account instead, where you have no recourse).
joubert 17y ago
No you don't. You can use an American Express gift card bought at Duane Reed. It is indistinguishable from an Amex credit card.

redorb 17y ago

This actually makes me want to jump in / its a indicator to me that your not that far behind in the game (getting in early, with the android system) - - I really think it 3-5 years android will be what apple is today; I'm not saying to wait around - but perhaps plan for it.

lurch_mojoff 17y ago
You, however, do not address either what makes you think that or where would Apple be in you scenario. As thing are today, there is nothing to suggest that Apple are losing steam or that Android is gaining such at a higher rate. It is true in probably every respect of the two platforms, but it is especially true when it comes to the respective app stores. So in that case my prognosmification would be that, even if you're right and Android is where the iPhone is today in a few years, Apple's platform would have grown too by then, maybe even proportionally to Android. Which does not mean one should not develop applications for Android or that they shouldn't "plan for it". But expecting that there is explosive growth just around the corner is absolutely unrealistic.
- alex_c 17y ago
  There IS explosive growth just around the corner in terms of Android device models. Of course, this doesn't necessarily translate into explosive growth in terms of users.
  - joubert 17y ago
    Good lordy. Well, hopefully it isn't blamed on users' relationship issues.
  - thismat 17y ago
    If they would bring the HTC Hero in to multiple providers they would see a pretty significant jump in users I would imagine. Although, that new Nokia looks pretty great, I might be switching to it if T-Mobile doesn't end up getting the Hero, bad choice ignoring the Hero for the one they used for the mytouch.
17y ago

breck 17y ago

It's true if you want to make money, develop for the iPhone and not the Android. But if you want to build neat, useful things I'd say in the long run the Android platform will be better. I think Android versus iPhone is kind of an Apples to Oranges comparison. It's like comparing the PC with the Xbox. Sure, you can make a ton of money developing games for the Xbox, but that also means you have to develop games. From what I've read(with some exceptions), the real money made on the iPhone is in developing games. I wouldn't develop for the Android to make money. I would do it to make cool apps that I would use myself and could distribute myself without going through the App store & review process. I think the Android will be the cooler platform to develop for eventually, unless all you care about is making money. In which case make games.

potatolicious 17y ago
"It's true if you want to make money, develop for the iPhone and not the Android." I would argue that if you want to make money, develop for neither.
- enjo 17y ago
  Yep. The economics on both platforms are really nasty right now.

mis 17y ago

The problem is with the Market application. It's horrible. That being said, I don't have a top 5 app, not even a top 100 app for that matter, but I do make between 50 and 20 dollars a day from it. Better than nothing, and the trend is upward.

torpor 17y ago
There are alternatives to the Android Market: http://www.mymarket.cc/ http://www.mymarket.cc/ Try it out, see what you think ..

technomancy 17y ago

As Milton said: "Better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven."

lurch_mojoff 17y ago
On the other hand, and much more pragmatically, better $3000 a day than $60 a day.

maxklein 17y ago

Android is the linux of the smartphone OSes, and the iPhone OS is the windows.

dejb 17y ago
The compulsory centralised app store model of the iPhone makes it an entirely new beast (apart from consoles). The difference is big enough to invalidate the comparison with Windows. Also the fact that their market share is still below below 10% world wide also puts a dint in your metaphor.
mattparcher 17y ago
Yes, Android is obscure, but the iPhone almost certainly is not the equivalent of Windows. By most estimates, the iPhone has half of RIM's share in the US, while Apple is a bit closer worldwide (figures vary). According to Information Week, the hardware breaks down as: US: RIM 52%, iPhone 23.3% (up 365% vs 2Q08) HTC 5.6% Global: Nokia 44%, RIM 21%, Apple 13.7% (up 627% vs 2Q08) http://www.informationweek.com/news/personal_tech/smartphones/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=219400707 http://www.informationweek.com/news/personal_tech/smartphone...

jsz0 17y ago

If Google is serious about their App Store, and with Google that's always a concern, they should be promoting the platform. Apple is actively highlighting third party apps as a major selling point of the iPhone platform with constant TV commercials showing off some of the best apps. Google's approach to multiple handset vendors already makes the situation confusing to consumers so it's even more important they advertise. A Google commercial showing off 2 or 3 different Android handsets running some third party apps would be a massive boost for the platform and handset makers. Someone pointed out that the Android platform is really starting to feel like "Linux on the desktop" where it's always the next handset, the next OS revision, etc that's going to change everything. The same basic rule applies: If you fall too far behind commercial alternatives you will lose no matter how good your platform is. Personally I think Google's window of opportunity is very small here. If they can't start making some headway the game is over when the iPhone hits Verizon.

jrockway 17y ago
I don't think Google has even tried to market Android yet. Letting the technical users get all the bugs out is a good strategy. Once that is taken care of, Google can open the floodgates. They're an advertising company, remember, so when they want to get the message out, they will do it. But anyway, this is not critically important right now. Andorid and iPhone both satisfy the "I wonder if there's an app for..." for any reasonable value of ... right now. If you have an Android phone, it will do anything you want a phone to do. If you have an iPhone, it will also do anything you want a phone to do (minus being location aware, or having third-party caller ID data loaded when someone calls, or writing your own programs for it, etc.).

dejb 17y ago

I think comparing 'Android Marketplace' with Apple's 'App Store' is somewhat comparing 'apples with oranges'. Android doesn't require all apps to go through their marketplace so you would expect less downloads per user. Android could flourish without any centralised marketplace. Desktop OS's certainly have.

acangiano 17y ago

What prevents a startup from creating an alternative marketplace that accepts all sorts of mainstream payments methods, works within and outside of the US, and doesn't suck? It was my understanding that Android, unlike the iPhone, could install applications from elsewhere.

Andys 17y ago

Here are some reasons why: 1. Poor availability of app store in many countries in the world compared to iPhone 2. Ability to purchase apps outside the appstore - I bought an app from an author's website directly, paying by Paypal. 3. Fewer actual handsets in use worldwide.

spaghetti 17y ago

Give Android Market some time. Recall iTunes was hugely successful before the iPhone came out. Also purchasing music for an iPod is almost identical to purchasing an app for the iPhone (relatively small price for a relatively small item). So App Store just has a huge lead. Doesn't imply Android won't catch up. After all compare Apple vs MS today to Apple vs MS 10-15 years ago.

paulsilver 17y ago

I haven't seen any adverts for Android phones pushing that they have 'Android' as a feature, nor have I seen any adverts for the Android app store. Whereas the iPhone was heavily marketed at normal consumers. It is not surprising that very few people are using the Android store, given that few people know of it's existence. Google and the phone makers are playing the game very differently to Apple. I think it's going to be a long time before I could claim Android is a failure, it's still very early days for the project.

p47 17y ago

I have 2 apps on AMarket right now, making far to less money to live from them. Only solution is to work as a consultant for bigger players. But still the same model is on App Store, my friend who is independent do the same. Nice thing about Android is that casual users won't even know they are using Android, when smartphones will become standard. And slowly they are becoming. From my perspective, AMarket when GOOG will finally make it usable (2.0 in month) may become really profitable. 3 mln users right now. Also new handhelds look really promising, and if Motorola treats Android as their last resort, well I, as a small fish need to follow bigger players behaviour.