3 ms·
What's in it for the real Satoshi in that? By the way, Satoshi's old accunt was used to deny it. http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/profile/SatoshiNakamoto http://p
by nawitus 12y ago
What's in it for the real Satoshi in that? By the way, Satoshi's old accunt was used to deny it.
http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/profile/SatoshiNakamoto http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/profile/SatoshiNakamoto
- MrBuddyCasino 12y agoI know that, but that doesn't prove anything. - If Dorian was the real Satoshi, he would of course have used his 'real' account to try to disprove the claim. - If not, the only to way to know for sure that he is not the guy is for the other 'real' Satoshi to prove that it couldn't be Dorian. Simple as that. I agree that in the second case, the real Satoshi would not have a lot of incentive to prove the mistake. I'm not a conspiracy nut, I'm just saying that it has not been proven that Dorian is not the guy.
- dpark 12y agoHow exactly could Satoshi prove that he isn't Dorian Nakamoto?
- psykovsky 12y agoProving negatives is easy. /s
- bpicolo 12y agoBy proving he is somebody else? Not saying he would, just saying it would work.
- dpark 12y agoFair enough. :) I should have asked how he could prove it without revealing his actual identity.
- u124556 12y agoHow exactly could Satoshi prove that he isn't Dorian Nakamoto without disclosing his real identity?