4 ms·
Personally I find www. no less cryptic than http:// http://. Additionally http:// http:// is hidden in many browsers these days, so you're left with just {,www.
by qu4z-2 12y ago
Personally I find www. no less cryptic than http:// http://. Additionally http:// http:// is hidden in many browsers these days, so you're left with just {,www.}example.com/ and don't need the filler.
Regarding "who cares about urls nowadays?", clearly the people in this thread making passionate arguments for and against a leading www. care :)
- kolev 12y agoI agree most people probably cannot decode WWW, but, as I said, years have been invested to educate the populace that a web address starts with www. and ends with .com. So, when you see www.hello.com, I don't need to put labels and stuff - people know this is an address. If I put "computer.systems", you won't know unless I label.