2 ms·
> Go aims to be more simple and concise, in the end you write less code to do the same thing, as you would in C++, Haskell or Rust.. I sincerely doubt that Go
by Dewie 12y ago
> Go aims to be more simple and concise, in the end you write less code to do the same thing, as you would in C++, Haskell or Rust..
I sincerely doubt that Go is more concise than Haskell. I won't say whether concise is good or bad, but I very much doubt that Go is the most concise.
- ponce 12y agoGo doesn't allow to create reusable, zero-cost abstractions so I guess it's not more concise than C++ either.