If that's the only valid reason to use "www" (as opposed to "mmm" or anything else) then why wouldn't an article titled "Why use www?" mention it? It seems lik

If that's the only valid reason to use "www" (as opposed to "mmm" or anything else) then why wouldn't an article titled "Why use www?" mention it? It seems like people are just looking for ways to rationalize their preference for seeing "www" in URLs, so are latching onto any and every possible argument to justify that bias. There are a few valid considerations on both sides, but ultimately this strikes me as just the latest bit of churn in tech fashion.