3 ms·
I've never had any problems with etags, either. I've always gotten the same functionality as vim. Maybe we are missing something.
by farresito 12y ago
I've never had any problems with etags, either. I've always gotten the same functionality as vim. Maybe we are missing something.
- falcolas 12y agoI had this same problem: they function differently in evil mode than Emacs mode; for some reason evil does its own word boundary definitions for etags lookups, and it breaks up words on underscores. I dug into it, and it was some problem with evil's word semantics (that only existed for etags lookups). I ran out of energy to debug it further, and just went back to Vim. Regular etags called with the emacs bindings worked just fine, but switching contexts from evil mode was a pain.
- kornerstoane 12y agoThanks for quantifying it for me. I never dug in deep enough to figure it out. It always just felt "wonky" when I used. (That's an opinion, of course.)
- aidenn0 12y agoCould you mention this on the mailing list? I don't know if I'll have time to fix it any time soon, but someone else might, and that needs to be fixed.