>Ah you're one of the people that thinks open source also comes with a mandatory ideology. Now, who is redefining words? >That it's not good enough if source

>Ah you're one of the people that thinks open source also comes with a mandatory ideology. Now, who is redefining words? >That it's not good enough if source is released for everyone unless there are also other strings attached. Where can I find the source for those binary blobs? >You have to redefine a lot of words if "sharing aggregated non-personally identifiable information" is to mean the same as "selling your data" Thankfully, no redefinition is needed. That information is MY DATA. Sharing DOES NOT exclude monetary transactions. My general experience has been that companies do not share anything of value for free. >(e.g. statistics of "how many people aged 18-25 are seeing my ad?") e.g. aggregated statistics of people aged 20-21 living in the zipcode XXXXX who have lung cancer. Oops.. turns out, its just one person. >We don’t sell users’ personal information. Tell that to Google. They're contradicting themselves.