Software architects arguing about methodologies without discussing the real problems and context where those methodologies are applicable - because they can't s

Software architects arguing about methodologies without discussing the real problems and context where those methodologies are applicable - because they can't show that code. Instead they use some fuzzy general notions which don't communicate any relevant information. I don't understand - how is this useful? Can anything be learnt from this at all? Its very clear to me that no useful conclusions can be reached from debating like this - is it just me? The only substantial content was a comment on the gist [1] that explores a problem that looks like it came from a production system. Methodology discussions would really benefit from at least one semi-realistic example like that. [1]: https://gist.github.com/dhh/4849a20d2ba89b34b201#comment-1228640 https://gist.github.com/dhh/4849a20d2ba89b34b201#comment-122...