3 ms·
>Can we at least conclude that our probabilities outperform bookmakers? More like outperform the market? Not sure if more precise probabilities outweigh the r
by r41nbowcrash 12y ago
>Can we at least conclude that our probabilities outperform bookmakers?
More like outperform the market?
Not sure if more precise probabilities outweigh the risk of ruin, if there's unbalanced amount of money backing each option.
- pitnips 12y agoIn gambling, bookmakers = the market. Just like a lot of demand (unbalanced amount of money) buying up a stock pushes up the price, the same will cause bookmakers to adjust their lines.
- cwyers 12y agoIt's very, very hard to make a model that outperforms bookmakers in the long run. If you find some sort of inefficiency in the betting market, maybe. But it turns out that most often the betting market is inefficient at the points where casual betters outnumber the "sharps," which tends to be the points at which the bookmakers have the highest juice on their odds, so you're not likely to come out ahead anyway.
- izyda 12y agodo you happen to know where one could find data on this? Not just bookmakers' odds, but volume of bets? This would make for interesting research
- phillc73 12y agoBetfair has an API. This can be used to return the odds and volumes matched for all sports on their Exchange platform. https://developer.betfair.com/ https://developer.betfair.com/