> "… because apparantly that he has a right to prohibit others learning about his wrong-doings." That's not what the ruling was about. If we are to discuss thi

> "… because apparantly that he has a right to prohibit others learning about his wrong-doings." That's not what the ruling was about. If we are to discuss this ruling it would help if people tried to understand it a little better, rather than claiming 'censorship' at every turn.