3 ms·
It would be great if a statement like this had been issued by some form of camera reviewer, and not a blog citing MacRumors. There are a lot of reasons I'd buy
by eddieroger 12y ago
It would be great if a statement like this had been issued by some form of camera reviewer, and not a blog citing MacRumors. There are a lot of reasons I'd buy an iPod touch (like being a burner test device for iOS 8), but to have a pocket camera isn't one of them.
- sosuke 12y agoI agree, if it had been from DPReview perhaps. Their phone camera reviews are excellent, http://connect.dpreview.com/post/7518611407/apple-iphone5s-smartphone-camera-review http://connect.dpreview.com/post/7518611407/apple-iphone5s-s...
- Holbein 12y agoThe article failed to mention that the previous $199 ipod touch hasn't had a camera, but now it does. Apple mentioned in a previous keynote that that $199 price point is kind of a magical barrier. If you can lower your price to <200, lots of people consider it that previously have not thought about buying it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfgyQcyDthw#t=425 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfgyQcyDthw#t=425 (jump to 7:05) So what they tried to communicate, badly, was: a product that is already a best-seller now also includes a camera. So now it has the potential to upend another category after music, communication and gaming: photography.