4 ms·
Aw nu, not the "anything that's true should be allowed in wikipedia" meme again. Seriously, why haven't all the people who believe this got together and started
by hughprime 17y ago
Aw nu, not the "anything that's true should be allowed in wikipedia" meme again. Seriously, why haven't all the people who believe this got together and started a new inclusionist encyclopaedia yet, instead of trying to force wikipedia into being something that its guidelines clearly state that it isn't?
- gojomo 17y agoMy hunch is that eventually a tipping point will be reached, and either the guidelines will be boldly edited (for the better), or a new inclusionist alternative will emerge. Until then, that Wikipedia is 'good enough' but stuck in its ways is suppressing the emergence of an even better alternative.