>>(Question 5) What? No! Why use algorithms that have been broken for years? It’s ridiculously fast to break both, along with many other simple algorithms. I'd

>>(Question 5) What? No! Why use algorithms that have been broken for years? It’s ridiculously fast to break both, along with many other simple algorithms. I'd remove the emphasized text. Yes they are vulnerable to collision attacks but that's completely irrelevant in this context.