So they freely admit that they lied to customers and charged them for fees to law firms in fact did not exist, but were invented by themselves... I fail to see

So they freely admit that they lied to customers and charged them for fees to law firms in fact did not exist, but were invented by themselves... I fail to see how this doesn't immediately lead to prosecution for fraud. Maybe I don't understand the finer points of the law, but it seems like they're saying: "Yeah, we attempted to get money from people by lying to them," which in my naive world sounds exactly like a confession of fraudulently obtaining money. Where are the DPP for goodness' sake?