5 ms·
Your analysis assumes healthcare is like any other commodity. While the primary aim of the ACA is not overall cost reduction (but, rather, make it affordable f
by clavalle 12y ago
Your analysis assumes healthcare is like any other commodity.
While the primary aim of the ACA is not overall cost reduction (but, rather, make it affordable for the uninsured to get insurance), there are several reasons it could go down that path.
The marketplaces and minimum standards for insurance plans make it easier to comparison shop.
The fact that people will have insurance will lead to earlier and cheaper treatments for potentially serious disease.
Businesses can get out of the insurance business altogether. As businesses remove themselves from the equation individuals will be more attuned to the cost of their insurance plans and shop accordingly.
There are some direct provisions for paying providers for disease prevention and effective treatments that lead to patients not having to return for the same issue rather than just for treatments reversing that twisted financial incentive.
Granted, there are plenty of ways for these potential cost benefits to go sour but there is a good chance that the ACA will actually reduce costs relative to what they would have been without the ACA.
- refurb 12y agoCheck out the Oregon Medicaid study and you'll find evidence that counters your claims, namely that access to healthcare improves health outcomes (i.e. early detection and treatment did not lead to measurably better outcomes). [1] It's a pretty impressive study. They took a number of uninsured in Oregon and held a lottery. Half of the people got free access to Medicaid and the other half remained uninsured. The study found that costs go up (because people now have health insurance), but people weren't better off in terms of health (except for those with depression). [1]http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Medicaid_health_experiment http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Medicaid_health_experi...
- clavalle 12y agoTwo years of Medicaid expansion in a relatively young city? Seems like the study didn't reach any significant conclusions at all...