4 ms·
So the author thought, "I'll make an article about pro/con lists", but he thought he'd make it sexist and racist while he's at it. That's hilarious. Couldn't y
by mantraxD 12y ago
So the author thought, "I'll make an article about pro/con lists", but he thought he'd make it sexist and racist while he's at it. That's hilarious.
Couldn't you pick something less controversial, like say, comparing religions, political parties or sports teams?
- minimaxir 12y agoThose are strange examples of "less controversial." A "less controversial" topic of comparison would be boxers vs. briefs. EDIT: I'm bad at sarcasm detection.
- jaredsohn 12y agoI am pretty sure the GP was being sarcastic with that list of alternatives (if it just mentioned one of those things, the GP might have just made a mistake, but by naming three controversial things and nothing else, it was likely said sarcastically.
- bloomstein 12y agoThere is nothing sexist or racist about this article, unless you believe that stating a black person is black is somehow offensive towards black people.
- Jemaclus 12y agoWell, the black person also got 0 points for "smart"...
- Pxtl 12y agoActually, he marks black as a "pro" which is an almost hilariously mathematical form of racism.
- yummyfajitas 12y agoLike many people, I hold certain aesthetic preferences. You can call me racist while continuing to prefer blondes to brunettes if it makes you feel good about yourself.
- DeadHitchhiker 12y agoThe line between 'aesthetic preference' and 'fetish object' is a fine one.
- sp332 12y agoThe persona in the article is a parody of a man who judges women, and not an actual judgment of women.