3 ms·
Author here. I know that treating the L^2 ball as somehow equivalent to binary vectors is invalid - I even say so in the post. If it helps, I explicitly point o
by yummyfajitas 12y ago
Author here. I know that treating the L^2 ball as somehow equivalent to binary vectors is invalid - I even say so in the post. If it helps, I explicitly point out the place where the real work for the binary vector would have to go.
The basic idea is I think is to use the central limit theorem on dot(u,d) and dot(p,d) - but unfortunately the CLT does not show that these two dot products are independent.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- DeadHitchhiker 12y agoJust remember: Your name is on this and you're intentionally pouring gasoline onto an issue that didn't need it.