3 ms·
s/used/should/ It's nice to not "read more after the jump" or "below the fold", no over-pagination, no 100% width 400px deep semi-relevant banner image, no pul
by 5h 12y ago
s/used/should/
It's nice to not "read more after the jump" or "below the fold", no over-pagination, no 100% width 400px deep semi-relevant banner image, no pull quotes in 30px ultra-bold fonts floated over to the sides, no "you may also be interested in" and no asinine comments, .. oh, wait!
- w0ts0n 12y agoI disagree. This is way to much information for me to digest. I think a happy medium is nice. Enough information on the screen to get the point across but not too little that I have to click everything to find out what I need.
- 5h 12y agoOf course I'm exaggerating, and I agree this page isn't particularly friendly but nor is it intended to be, its a reference to be searched rather than a piece of prose to be read. A lot of pages I find frustrating are often trying to spin a narrative around what amounts to reference material, or vice-versa & results are often framed with the tropes I mentioned above.
- dllthomas 12y agoIt seems like those could even be two different views into the same material, potentially.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- rbonvall 12y agoAs opposed to the modern trend where there is too much non-information to digest.
- thesteamboat 12y agos/used/used to/