4 ms·

If machines are flying over your head, would you feel safe going out without a helmet on your head? Despite all safety measures, you know it'll happen at some

If machines are flying over your head, would you feel safe going out without a helmet on your head? Despite all safety measures, you know it'll happen at some point. One of those will fail, its safety will fail and it'll drop on the head of some kid and put it in the hospital. I can predict immediately that birds and drones colliding will be one of the biggest problems (and it's not something you can fix with frequent tech checkups, as it's not a technical failure, just a fact of life). Having casualties is the case with cars too, of course, but it's a whole new kind of terror to expect not just cars hitting you coming from the street, but also machines dropping from the sky (where you usually aren't even looking). I'd take one of those risks, but not both at the same time. I can't look for both at the same time. And I'm not saying "ban them" is the only solution, but this has to be solved somehow.

exDM69 12y ago
> If machines are flying over your head, would you feel safe going out without a helmet on your head? No, not with the current state of technology. That's why I think that this ban is in the right thing to do for the time being. > I can predict immediately that birds and drones colliding will be one of the biggest problems You're definitely right, bird strikes are a hazard for drones, model aircraft and big aviation alike. Unlike big aircraft (which can dodge big flocks at best), a drone is more maneuverable and could be able to dodge birds to some degree using some kind of camera technology. Of course, a bird may also intentionally attack a drone (they certainly attack my kites occasionally), which is a harder problem to solve. These are challenges that have to be overcome with navigation, camera and drone-to-drone communication techniques as well as redundancy. Before we can put a number estimating the statistical risks of drone traffic, it is premature to think about large scale commercial operations. I think that it's inevitable that we'll have such a number (ie. number of incidents per hours of drone flight), and we can utilize technologies that will bring that number down to acceptable levels (ie. near or below existing road and air traffic risks). When that happens, re-thinking this restriction (not necessarily lifting it) is due.

exDM69 12y ago

> If machines are flying over your head, would you feel safe going out without a helmet on your head? No, not with the current state of technology. That's why I think that this ban is in the right thing to do for the time being. > I can predict immediately that birds and drones colliding will be one of the biggest problems You're definitely right, bird strikes are a hazard for drones, model aircraft and big aviation alike. Unlike big aircraft (which can dodge big flocks at best), a drone is more maneuverable and could be able to dodge birds to some degree using some kind of camera technology. Of course, a bird may also intentionally attack a drone (they certainly attack my kites occasionally), which is a harder problem to solve. These are challenges that have to be overcome with navigation, camera and drone-to-drone communication techniques as well as redundancy. Before we can put a number estimating the statistical risks of drone traffic, it is premature to think about large scale commercial operations. I think that it's inevitable that we'll have such a number (ie. number of incidents per hours of drone flight), and we can utilize technologies that will bring that number down to acceptable levels (ie. near or below existing road and air traffic risks). When that happens, re-thinking this restriction (not necessarily lifting it) is due.