3 ms·
These boot camps are obviously a reaction to the current demand for developers. I'm not sure if that is permeant. That aside I like the idea here. I think 1-4
by netcan 12y ago
These boot camps are obviously a reaction to the current demand for developers. I'm not sure if that is permeant.
That aside I like the idea here. I think 1-4 months is a greta period of time. You can maintain a great pace that way. Personally, I do better in sprints. My University years were really 5-6 2 week sprints a year spread out between long periods of procrastination (and fun). The useful work I did outside of sprints doesn't amount to much.
The idea of paying your tuition (ideally, lower than £12k), working hard for 9 weeks and expecting to meet some legitimately valuable goals at the end of it is appealing to me.
Obviously I'm getting speculative, but I can imagine something like this being a fixture of 'lifelong education. Something you can do dozens of times in a lifetime.
Zero-to-junior developer is obviously in the current market, can sustain that high tuition. But, I would like to see tuition go down to levels that can make it available for other markets.
I can imagine a lot of useful 9-week sprint courses that could be very effective, if the quality was high enough. Writing. Data mining. Accounting.
- dakotaben 12y agoas a side note (and recent grad), we actually started working several months prior to the 9 week on site curriculum. We had 12 weeks of organized curriculum at home and some prep for that. I feel that by the time you arrive on site, you already feel a little comfortable with procedural ruby, javascript, html & css. The real hard work and long hours do happen while on site though.