21 ms·
It would help if you could point me to something that is better than STL (in performance and ease of use) and addresses the full scope of STL. I have asked this
by srean 12y ago
It would help if you could point me to something that is better than STL (in performance and ease of use) and addresses the full scope of STL. I have asked this a few times, but all I have got so far is cricket chirps or pointers to worse bloatware. Not claiming that such a thing does not exist, rather would be happy to give such a thing a try. It would also lend more heft to your comment.
- mtdewcmu 12y agoAny library that addresses exactly the same use case as STL is going to have the same limitations as STL. Everything is a trade-off. I think you can probably assume that STL does about as good a job as any library would, given identical trade-offs. Note that the actual implementations will vary by platform and compiler.
- Peaker 12y agoThe STL is an arbitrary collection of libraries. For any specific library within it, I might be able to. For example, the Linux kernel's list.h is far superior to std::list.