4 ms·
Perfect write-up. My sentiments exactly. And thanks for expanding on the "how this happens". I transitioned quickly from the startup-culture to enterprise and
by antjanus 12y ago
Perfect write-up. My sentiments exactly. And thanks for expanding on the "how this happens".
I transitioned quickly from the startup-culture to enterprise and find it a better fit, but let's talk about what you're writing:
1. I think that the customer-facing stuff is what draws the crowds in, but outside of that, a lot of people just don't give "bigger stuff" a thought. They're not put in front of a problem, hell, most people don't even know what the "problem" is. Including me. Even if I wanted to help, I don't know where to start and how I could create a one-man operation to somehow contribute. I haven't seen, to my knowledge, any open source projects that dealt with "making a change" as opposed to creating a nice set of icons.
2. Identification is definitely an issue, as I've said. We just don't know what the problems are. As a young person (hopefully still classified as that), I see the problems right in front of me, the 1st-world problems of having trouble finding friends, not knowing how to get into specific hobbies, having trouble remembering my grocery list, budgeting, sending anon hot pics to some stranger etc. Basically stuff that's been solved, and reinvented (though not perfectly) by hundreds of companies. Having been in programming for the past 3 years, I see SOME problems worth solving, but I'm not sure how to approach them.
3. The thing about "meaningful" work is that, there must be a way to do it open source, have people take part in it, contribute and get together on it, and even do it quickly. Not just in the big leagues: healthcare, water etc. No single person can get in on that, and companies that are in it are in it for the long haul. As a developer, i wouldn't want to touch that. It's years of work with potentially no results. Customer-facing stuff can take off right away. My wish is to find a sweet spot.
4. Good point. No idea what those companies are whatsoever. I'd love to read about more companies like that though.
As far as healthcare. I feel like that's a ticking time bomb. There are too many regulations to just jump in, too many slowly moving entities, and too many companies with a high stake in the game to oust you. In the tech field (the tech for the sake of tech), people use each other's ideas and evolve quickly to keep up and better themselves, no matter who they are and without ego (somewhat).
All in all, I wish the problems could be laid out, and people could work on it. I work with education stuff in my day job, and I see the issues, and as part of my job we try to solve the problems. Which is wonderful but it's difficult to identify the problems even if you work with them every day. It's easy to say "shit's broken", it's more difficult to say "here's where it's broken" and even worse to say, "find me a solution, and it'll be fixed".
- illini123 12y agoInteresting perspectives. To touch on your 3rd point, that is the inherent problem in these industries: the companies are in it for the long-haul. Do they wind up innovating? No. Epic Systems in healthcare is a fabulous example: http://www.forbes.com/sites/zinamoukheiber/2013/05/15/a-chat-with-epic-systems-ceo-judy-faulkner/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/zinamoukheiber/2013/05/15/a-chat... They code in MUMPS. MUMPS predates C. Yes, you heard me right. The healthcare IT platform that is espoused across the industry is based on what should, for all intents and purposes, be a dead language. I've taken a bit different approach with some of these industries, and I come from the belief that it's going to require a combination of intellectual partners (like universities and research centers) together with startups to make any sort of meaningful difference. I'm right now in a niche segment of behavioral health. Funny enough, there is a law that was passed right before the ACA ("Obamacare") that mandates that hospitals put electronic medical records into practice, and over time develop "meaningful use." The big guys have been slow to deliver, the insurance companies want to see change, and the hospitals have to do it for fear of penalty. A lot of people saw disaster, but I saw an opportunity. Over the last several months, I've been working to commercialize some of my research coming out of grad school on this. I was fortunate enough to balance theory and application in school, and this definitely left me jaded towards the SnapChats of the world. As to your 4th point, that doesn't surprise me at all. I'm Chicago-based, and everyone views the Midwest as a rust belt. I co-led a research initiative that looked at startup activity in the Midwest around ag, health-tech, and advanced manufacturing: http://worldbusinesschicago.com/techcluster http://worldbusinesschicago.com/techcluster Sorry for the shameless self-promotion, but I feel bad that more dev guys just aren't aware of what's out there. It frustrates me so, so much. We glorify things in the industry that we just don't need. Here is Siebel's talk: http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=2110 http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=2110 Watch it. He's a horribly boring speaker, but the content spoke to me. It's what convinced me to look for the low-hanging fruit in health-tech. Funny; now that I found a problem that can be addressed (that isn't), and have a defensible business model, bringing on a technical co-founder can be so hard for all the reasons we just named. Ha!