3 ms·
http://www.seed-db.com/companies/funding?value=1 http://www.seed-db.com/companies/funding?value=1 plus a little extra meta-data from crunchbase. Seed-DB (so far
by viggity 12y ago
http://www.seed-db.com/companies/funding?value=1 http://www.seed-db.com/companies/funding?value=1 plus a little extra meta-data from crunchbase. Seed-DB (so far as I can tell) only tracks startups that went through an accelerator. We've got a larger list that includes everyone, but it made viewing the accelerator info more difficult because there are so many startups that haven't gone through one.
We'll probably create another board with all startups but will probably do it on a company basis instead of a funding round basis. There are a lot of different ways you could want to see this data.
If you sign up for the beta, we'll let you know when you can create your own. We're following the github model - public projects are free, private projects have a modest fee.
- balls187 12y ago> Seed-DB (so far as I can tell) only tracks startups that went through an accelerator. You should alter the HN post's title to reflect that.
- namenotrequired 12y agoYou think so? I read the title and it never crossed my mind to think it was all funding. To me the fact that it says "this much of it" already implies it's a selection. Edit: that said, the page should definitely mention it (the source and selection criteria).
- balls187 12y agoIt wasn't apparent from the title that this data was mostly from Seed-DB, and partly from Crunchbase. Seed-DB is accelerator based funding, and the crunchbase data that was used is incomplete. It lists Seattle behind Atlanta in terms of Startup Funding.