3 ms·
No judge would actually argue for a right to travel so broadly defined that it would essentially remove all regulatory power over who can and cannot fly. Why n
by jacalata 12y ago
No judge would actually argue for a right to travel so broadly defined that it would essentially remove all regulatory power over who can and cannot fly.
Why not?
- the_watcher 12y agoBecause judges are hesitant to make such sweeping redefinitions of established law. Not that it doesn't happen, or taking a position on whether it's optimal, but it's incredibly uncommon, and generally frowned upon by the judicial and legal community. Even the most ardent judicial activists tend to favor change by increment.