3 ms·

Can you enlighten us what is so disgusting about this in your opinion, this seems to be a straight forward agreement to use the content provided to Google. Not

by dudus 12y ago

Can you enlighten us what is so disgusting about this in your opinion, this seems to be a straight forward agreement to use the content provided to Google. Not worse than any other EULA I've read.

bitlord_219 12y ago
Not so, say those in the know: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/06/24/notice_and_shakedown_google_mafiastyle_contract_for_indie_music_revealed/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/06/24/notice_and_shakedown...
- magicalist 12y ago
  That article seems entirely based on the comments on the OP. The only major quote in there is from a comment by the publisher of the post. And it's wrong about its two major points, as other commenters pointed out: the contract doesn't limit "windowing", and the "covenant not to sue" just covers suing over copyright infringement for exactly what's covered in the contract itself.
- inventor 12y ago
  If you want people to take you seriously, never cite The Register.
  - wutbrodo 12y ago
    And in particular, citing them as "in the know" (as hilarious as it may be to do so).
  - deleted 12y ago
    [deleted]