4 ms·

This is disgusting

• dudus 12y ago
  Can you enlighten us what is so disgusting about this in your opinion, this seems to be a straight forward agreement to use the content provided to Google. Not worse than any other EULA I've read.
  • bitlord_219 12y ago
    Not so, say those in the know: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/06/24/notice_and_shakedown_google_mafiastyle_contract_for_indie_music_revealed/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/06/24/notice_and_shakedown...
    • magicalist 12y ago
      That article seems entirely based on the comments on the OP. The only major quote in there is from a comment by the publisher of the post. And it's wrong about its two major points, as other commenters pointed out: the contract doesn't limit "windowing", and the "covenant not to sue" just covers suing over copyright infringement for exactly what's covered in the contract itself.
    • inventor 12y ago
      If you want people to take you seriously, never cite The Register.
      • wutbrodo 12y ago
        And in particular, citing them as "in the know" (as hilarious as it may be to do so).
      • deleted 12y ago
        [deleted]
• jamesbritt 12y ago
  Can you elaborate?
• nobodyshere 12y ago
  Quite as usual, you should expect them back away from this deal and soften it a lot in case it gets massive public attention and criticism. They have competitors, and those will not fail to use this moment.
• qmr 12y ago
  Text as image. I know, right?